312-49V11 · Question #169
Dave, a Computer Hacking Forensic Investigator (CHFI), is investigating a case of suspected cybercrime in a major organization. During the investigation, he identified a suspect s electronic device…
The correct answer is C. Obtain a warrant mentioning the specific devices to be investigated. Accessing and extracting data from a suspect's device generally requires proper legal authorization (e.g., a warrant) that specifies the devices and scope. Without it, evidence may be inadmissible and the investigator may violate privacy and procedural requirements.
Question
Dave, a Computer Hacking Forensic Investigator (CHFI), is investigating a case of suspected cybercrime in a major organization. During the investigation, he identified a suspect s electronic device that might contain crucial evidence. Before Dave proceeds with extracting the data from the device, what is the most important legal obligation he should consider to ensure compliance with privacy laws?
Options
- AObtain permission from the owners of the data or system before publicizing the data
- BInform the suspect about the investigation
- CObtain a warrant mentioning the specific devices to be investigated
- DPreserve the anonymity of other users related to the target system
How the community answered
(49 responses)- A12% (6)
- B2% (1)
- C78% (38)
- D8% (4)
Explanation
Accessing and extracting data from a suspect's device generally requires proper legal authorization (e.g., a warrant) that specifies the devices and scope. Without it, evidence may be inadmissible and the investigator may violate privacy and procedural requirements.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.