nerdexam
Cisco

300-730 · Question #56

An engineer is troubleshooting a new DMVPN setup on a Cisco IOS router. After the show crypto isakmp sa command is issued, a response is returned of "MM_NO_STATE." Why does this failure occur?

The correct answer is C. The Phase 1 policy does not match on both devices. The 'MM_NO_STATE' status in IKEv1 Main Mode indicates the Phase 1 negotiation failed immediately, most commonly because the ISAKMP policy parameters do not match between peers.

Troubleshooting Using ASDM and CLI

Question

An engineer is troubleshooting a new DMVPN setup on a Cisco IOS router. After the show crypto isakmp sa command is issued, a response is returned of "MM_NO_STATE." Why does this failure occur?

Options

  • AThe ISAKMP policy priority values are invalid.
  • BESP traffic is being dropped.
  • CThe Phase 1 policy does not match on both devices.
  • DTunnel protection is not applied to the DMVPN tunnel.

How the community answered

(50 responses)
  • A
    8% (4)
  • B
    4% (2)
  • C
    76% (38)
  • D
    12% (6)

Why each option

The 'MM_NO_STATE' status in IKEv1 Main Mode indicates the Phase 1 negotiation failed immediately, most commonly because the ISAKMP policy parameters do not match between peers.

AThe ISAKMP policy priority values are invalid.

ISAKMP policy priority values only determine the order in which policies are offered during negotiation; invalid or mismatched priorities do not themselves cause MM_NO_STATE if a matching policy set exists.

BESP traffic is being dropped.

ESP is an IPsec Phase 2 protocol; MM_NO_STATE reflects a failure in IKE Phase 1 Main Mode, which occurs before any Phase 2 or ESP negotiation begins.

CThe Phase 1 policy does not match on both devices.Correct

IKEv1 Main Mode requires both peers to agree on the same Phase 1 policy - including encryption algorithm, hash, authentication method, DH group, and lifetime. A mismatch in any of these parameters prevents the exchange from progressing past the initial proposal, resulting in the 'MM_NO_STATE' condition. This is the most common cause and the first thing to verify when this state is observed.

DTunnel protection is not applied to the DMVPN tunnel.

Tunnel protection applies IPsec to a GRE tunnel interface and affects traffic encapsulation, but its absence or misconfiguration does not directly cause the Phase 1 SA to fail to initialize.

Concept tested: DMVPN IKEv1 Phase 1 policy mismatch troubleshooting

Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security-vpn/ipsec-negotiation-ike-protocols/5409-ipsec-debug-00.html

Topics

#DMVPN#ISAKMP#MM_NO_STATE#Phase 1 mismatch

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 300-730 Practice