300-730 · Question #22
Refer to the exhibit: Interface: Tunnel1 Crypto map tag: Tunnel-head-0, local addr 192.168.0.1 protected vrf: (none) local ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0) remote ident (addr/mask/prot
The correct answer is B. DMVPN. The exhibit shows 'show crypto ipsec sa' output with a crypto map tag named 'Tunnel-head-0', a naming convention characteristic of DMVPN hub (head-end) configurations.
Question
Options
- Acrypto map tag
- BDMVPN
- CGRE
- DFlexVPN
- EVTI
How the community answered
(25 responses)- A4% (1)
- B80% (20)
- C4% (1)
- E12% (3)
Why each option
The exhibit shows 'show crypto ipsec sa' output with a crypto map tag named 'Tunnel-head-0', a naming convention characteristic of DMVPN hub (head-end) configurations.
Crypto map tag is a configuration element label that can be applied to any IPsec policy, not a VPN technology type that can be inferred from the output alone.
DMVPN hubs use a crypto map tag containing 'head' in the name (e.g., 'Tunnel-head-0') as part of the standard hub configuration for multipoint GRE over IPsec with NHRP. The combination of a tunnel interface, wildcard proxy identities (0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0), and this characteristic 'head' crypto map naming confirms a DMVPN deployment. Other VPN technologies use entirely different configuration structures and naming conventions.
GRE is a tunneling protocol used as the underlying transport within DMVPN, but standalone GRE tunnels do not produce a 'Tunnel-head' crypto map naming convention.
FlexVPN uses IKEv2 with virtual tunnel interfaces and a fundamentally different configuration model that does not produce crypto map tags with the 'head' identifier.
VTI creates static point-to-point IPsec tunnels with a different crypto map structure and naming scheme, and does not use the 'Tunnel-head' naming pattern.
Concept tested: DMVPN hub crypto map naming identification
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/sec_conn_dmvpn/configuration/xe-16/sec-conn-dmvpn-xe-16-book.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.