300-715 · Question #349
What is a difference between TACACS+ as compared to RADIUS from an AAA perspective?
The correct answer is A. TACACS+ separates AAA services, whereas RADIUS combines authentication and authorization. A key difference in AAA is that TACACS+ independently handles Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting services, while RADIUS combines Authentication and Authorization.
Question
What is a difference between TACACS+ as compared to RADIUS from an AAA perspective?
Options
- ATACACS+ separates AAA services, whereas RADIUS combines authentication and authorization.
- BTACACS+ combines all roles into a single privilege level, whereas RADIUS separates privilege
- CTACACS+ supports only Cisco devices, whereas RADIUS supports any RADUIS-compatible
- DTACACS+ supports only local authentication, whereas RADIUS supports remote authentication.
How the community answered
(45 responses)- A93% (42)
- B4% (2)
- C2% (1)
Why each option
A key difference in AAA is that TACACS+ independently handles Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting services, while RADIUS combines Authentication and Authorization.
TACACS+ strictly separates the Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting (AAA) services, meaning each can be handled independently, whereas RADIUS combines authentication and authorization into a single process or message.
TACACS+ is known for its granular authorization and support for multiple privilege levels, not combining all roles into a single privilege level.
While TACACS+ is Cisco proprietary, it can be used with non-Cisco devices that support it; RADIUS is an open standard and supports any RADIUS-compatible device, but the statement implies exclusivity that is inaccurate.
Both TACACS+ and RADIUS support remote authentication against various identity stores like Active Directory or LDAP, not just local authentication.
Concept tested: TACACS+ vs RADIUS AAA separation
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Security/DC-AAA.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.