nerdexam
Cisco

300-710 · Question #270

An engineer defines a new rule while configuring an Access Control Policy. After deploying the policy, the rule is not working as expected and the hit counters associated with the rule are showing…

The correct answer is D. An incorrect application signature was used in the rule. If an Access Control Policy rule's hit counters are zero and it is not working as expected, the most likely cause is an incorrect application signature being used in the rule.

Management and Troubleshooting

Question

An engineer defines a new rule while configuring an Access Control Policy. After deploying the policy, the rule is not working as expected and the hit counters associated with the rule are showing zero. What is causing this error?

Options

  • ALogging is not enabled for the rule.
  • BThe rule was not enabled after being created.
  • CThe wrong source interface for Snort was selected in the rule.
  • DAn incorrect application signature was used in the rule.

How the community answered

(41 responses)
  • A
    10% (4)
  • B
    2% (1)
  • C
    5% (2)
  • D
    83% (34)

Why each option

If an Access Control Policy rule's hit counters are zero and it is not working as expected, the most likely cause is an incorrect application signature being used in the rule.

ALogging is not enabled for the rule.

If logging is not enabled, hit counters would still increment, but no log events would be generated; the issue states hit counters are zero, implying no match.

BThe rule was not enabled after being created.

A rule that is not enabled would not even be considered for traffic matching, and typically rules are enabled upon creation or before deployment.

CThe wrong source interface for Snort was selected in the rule.

The source interface for Snort is a broader policy setting, not a per-rule configuration that would cause a single rule's hit counter to remain at zero due to an incorrect application match.

DAn incorrect application signature was used in the rule.Correct

An incorrect application signature means the Cisco FTD's deep packet inspection engine cannot correctly identify the intended application traffic. Consequently, no traffic will match the rule's criteria, resulting in zero hit counters and the rule not being applied.

Concept tested: Cisco FTD Access Control Policy rule matching

Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/firepower/70/configuration/guide/fpmc-config-guide-70/access_control_rules.html

Topics

#Access Control Policy#Application Control#Troubleshooting#Rule Matching

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 300-710 Practice