nerdexam
Cisco

300-710 · Question #152

A VPN user is unable to conned lo web resources behind the Cisco FTD device terminating the connection. While troubleshooting, the network administrator determines that the DNS responses are not…

The correct answer is B. Modify the Snort rules to allow legitimate DNS traffic to the VPN users. To resolve legitimate DNS responses being blocked by Cisco FTD for VPN users while still using Snort IPS rules, the specific Snort rules that are incorrectly blocking the DNS traffic must be identified and modified or tuned.

Management and Troubleshooting

Question

A VPN user is unable to conned lo web resources behind the Cisco FTD device terminating the connection. While troubleshooting, the network administrator determines that the DNS responses are not getting through the Cisco FTD. What must be done to address this issue while still utilizing Snort IPS rules?

Options

  • AUncheck the "Drop when Inline" box in the intrusion policy to allow the traffic.
  • BModify the Snort rules to allow legitimate DNS traffic to the VPN users.
  • CDisable the intrusion rule threshes to optimize the Snort processing.
  • DDecrypt the packet after the VPN flow so the DNS queries are not inspected

How the community answered

(54 responses)
  • A
    4% (2)
  • B
    74% (40)
  • C
    15% (8)
  • D
    7% (4)

Why each option

To resolve legitimate DNS responses being blocked by Cisco FTD for VPN users while still using Snort IPS rules, the specific Snort rules that are incorrectly blocking the DNS traffic must be identified and modified or tuned.

AUncheck the "Drop when Inline" box in the intrusion policy to allow the traffic.

Unchecking 'Drop when Inline' would convert all IPS blocking actions to alerts, allowing all detected malicious traffic through, which is a significant security risk and not a targeted fix for legitimate DNS.

BModify the Snort rules to allow legitimate DNS traffic to the VPN users.Correct

When legitimate DNS traffic is blocked by Cisco FTD while Snort IPS rules are active, it indicates that one or more Snort rules are misidentifying and dropping the valid DNS responses. The appropriate solution is to tune or modify these specific Snort rules to allow the legitimate DNS traffic, rather than broadly disabling IPS functionality.

CDisable the intrusion rule threshes to optimize the Snort processing.

Disabling intrusion rule thresholds ('threshes') would impact alert generation and resource usage, but it would not resolve legitimate traffic being blocked by the rules themselves.

DDecrypt the packet after the VPN flow so the DNS queries are not inspected

VPN traffic is decrypted *before* IPS inspection. The issue is Snort blocking the cleartext DNS. Attempting to decrypt *after* the VPN flow or bypass inspection entirely contradicts the requirement to 'still utilizing Snort IPS rules'.

Concept tested: Cisco FTD Snort IPS rule tuning

Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/firepower/70/configuration/guide/fpmc-config-guide-70/intrusion_policies.html

Topics

#FTD#Snort IPS#DNS Troubleshooting#Intrusion Policy

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 300-710 Practice