Refer to the exhibit. Which two actions does this Python code perform with the Cisco ACI? (Choose two.)

Question

Options

• AIt creates a subnet "DevNet_Subnet" inside VRF "DevNet_VRF" located in ACI tenant "DevNet_Tenant" and sets the scope to "private".
• BIt creates a subnet "DevNet_Subnet" inside AppProfile "DevNet_App" located in ACI tenant "DevNet_Tenant" and sets the network address to "10.10.1.24".
• CIt creates an EPG "DevNet_EPG" inside AppProfile "DevNet_App" located in ACI tenant "DevNet_Tenant" and link the EPG with BridgeDomain "DevNet_BD".
• DIt creates a subnet "DevNet_Subnet" inside VRF "DevNet_VRF" located in ACI tenant "DevNet_Tenant" and sets the network address to "10.10.10.1/24".
• EIt creates an EPG "DevNet_EPG" inside VRF "DevNet_VRF" located in ACI tenant "DevNet_Tenant" and link the EPG with BridgeDomain "DevNet_BD".

• A
  3% (1)
• B
  12% (4)
• C
  79% (27)
• E
  6% (2)

Explanation

Options C and D correctly reflect two distinct operations in the code. C accurately describes the EPG creation: in ACI's object hierarchy, EPGs (Endpoint Groups) are children of Application Profiles, not VRFs - and EPGs are associated with a Bridge Domain, not placed inside one. D correctly identifies the subnet's network address as 10.10.10.1/24 (valid CIDR notation), which the code sets as the parameter.

Why the distractors are wrong:

• A is wrong because the network address is listed as 10.10.1.24 - a malformed value missing the prefix length - and/or the scope doesn't match what the code sets.
• B is wrong because subnets in ACI are children of Bridge Domains, never AppProfiles - placing a subnet under an AppProfile violates ACI's object model.
• E is wrong because EPGs belong to AppProfiles, not VRFs. VRFs are a networking construct tied to Bridge Domains, not EPG containers.

Memory tip: Anchor the ACI hierarchy in your mind as two parallel trees under a Tenant - the policy tree (Tenant → AppProfile → EPG → BD link) and the network tree (Tenant → BD → Subnet, Tenant → VRF). Any answer that mixes objects across trees (EPG in a VRF, subnet in an AppProfile) is automatically wrong.

No community discussion yet for this question.