Cisco
300-620 · Question #248
A network engineer must optimize a Cisco ACI multi-pod deployment. Both pods are using the same pod policy group. The customer requirement is to avoid inter-pod traffic loss in case of planned or unpl
The correct answer is C. Configure a lower IS-IS metric for redistributed routes in ISIS Policy.. https://community.cisco.com/t5/data-center-and-cloud-blogs/aci-multi-pods-caveats-and- considerations/ba-p/3837927
Multi-Pod and Multi-Site
Question
A network engineer must optimize a Cisco ACI multi-pod deployment. Both pods are using the same pod policy group. The customer requirement is to avoid inter-pod traffic loss in case of planned or unplanned spine reload. Which action accomplishes this goal?
Options
- AConfigure the COOP type as compatible in COOP Group Policy.
- BConfigure MACsec in the MACsec Fabric Interface Policy.
- CConfigure a lower IS-IS metric for redistributed routes in ISIS Policy.
- DConfigure all spines as Route Reflectors in the BGP Route Reflector Policy.
How the community answered
(29 responses)- A3% (1)
- B3% (1)
- C83% (24)
- D10% (3)
Explanation
https://community.cisco.com/t5/data-center-and-cloud-blogs/aci-multi-pods-caveats-and- considerations/ba-p/3837927
Topics
#Multi-pod optimization#IS-IS metrics#Inter-pod traffic#Fabric resilience
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.