300-620 · Question #244
A network administrator is configuring a Cisco ACI fabric to automatically take a snapshot of all the configurations once per week. The snapshot must be saved on a server that is located in the data…
The correct answer is A. Scope: Fabric. To automatically take a snapshot of all Cisco ACI configurations, the snapshot must be configured with a Scope of Fabric to include all fabric-wide and tenant-specific settings.
Question
A network administrator is configuring a Cisco ACI fabric to automatically take a snapshot of all the configurations once per week. The snapshot must be saved on a server that is located in the data center. Which configuration meets these requirements?
Options
- AScope: Fabric
- BScope: Tenant
- CScope: Tenant
- DScope: Fabric
How the community answered
(29 responses)- A76% (22)
- B3% (1)
- C14% (4)
- D7% (2)
Why each option
To automatically take a snapshot of all Cisco ACI configurations, the snapshot must be configured with a Scope of Fabric to include all fabric-wide and tenant-specific settings.
Setting the snapshot scope to Fabric ensures that all configurations, including fabric-wide policies, access policies, and all tenant-specific configurations, are captured in the snapshot. This meets the requirement of taking a snapshot of 'all the configurations'.
Setting the snapshot scope to Tenant would only capture configurations related to a specific tenant and would not include fabric-wide or other tenant configurations, thus failing to meet the requirement of backing up 'all the configurations'.
Setting the snapshot scope to Tenant would only capture configurations related to a specific tenant and would not include fabric-wide or other tenant configurations, thus failing to meet the requirement of backing up 'all the configurations'.
Concept tested: Cisco ACI configuration snapshot scope
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/dcn/aci/apic/6x/config-guide/b_Cisco_APIC_Basic_Configuration_Guide_6_0_1/m-back-up-restore.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.