300-610 · Question #138
The end users report issues with datastore reachability between the newly installed virtual machines (VMs) and the storage array. The VMs are deployed on a Cisco C-Series server, directly connected wi
The correct answer is A. Implement FCoE traffic on VLAN 10 and data traffic on VLAN 99.. VMs deployed on a Cisco C-Series server connected via FCoE VLAN 99 (also the native VLAN) to Cisco Nexus switches cannot reach the datastore, while data traffic on VLAN 99 works.
Question
The end users report issues with datastore reachability between the newly installed virtual machines (VMs) and the storage array. The VMs are deployed on a Cisco C-Series server, directly connected with Cisco Nexus 5672UP switches over FCoE VLAN. The data traffic on VLAN 99, which is designated as a native VLAN, reaches its default gateway, but FCoE VLAN 99 fails to access the datastore. Which action resolves the problem?
Options
- AImplement FCoE traffic on VLAN 10 and data traffic on VLAN 99.
- BImplement host-facing FCoE ports as spanning-tree port type edge.
- CConfigure the FCoE VLAN in the VSAN database before including it in the trunk port.
- DConfigure the FCoE VLAN traffic on a separate interface from any other VLANs that traverse the
How the community answered
(43 responses)- A79% (34)
- B2% (1)
- C5% (2)
- D14% (6)
Why each option
VMs deployed on a Cisco C-Series server connected via FCoE VLAN 99 (also the native VLAN) to Cisco Nexus switches cannot reach the datastore, while data traffic on VLAN 99 works.
Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) traffic must not be carried on a native VLAN according to Cisco best practices and FCoE standards, as it can cause unexpected behavior, including traffic loss. By separating FCoE traffic to a dedicated non-native VLAN (e.g., VLAN 10) and using VLAN 99 for data traffic, FCoE frames will be properly tagged and processed, resolving the datastore reachability issue.
Configuring host-facing FCoE ports as spanning-tree port type edge speeds up port transitions but does not resolve the fundamental issue of FCoE traffic being carried on a native VLAN.
While FCoE VLANs must be associated with a VSAN, the core problem is the use of the native VLAN for FCoE traffic, not merely the configuration of the VSAN database.
Configuring FCoE VLAN traffic on a separate interface is often a good practice, but the immediate problem described is the use of the native VLAN on the same interface, so changing the VLAN ID on the existing FCoE interface is the direct solution.
Concept tested: FCoE native VLAN restrictions
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/unified_computing/ucs/sw/ucsm_fcoe/ucsm_fcoe_config_guide/ucs_fcoe_config_guide_chapter_010.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.