nerdexam
Cisco

300-435 · Question #140

How do traditional versus software-defined networks compare?

The correct answer is A. Software-defined networks support the use of Intent APIs, and traditional networks are typically hardware-based. Software-defined networks (SDNs) offer programmatic control through APIs, while traditional networks primarily rely on device-specific, hardware-based configurations.

Network Automation Foundation

Question

How do traditional versus software-defined networks compare?

Exhibit

300-435 question #140 exhibit

Options

  • ASoftware-defined networks support the use of Intent APIs, and traditional networks are typically hardware-based.
  • BSoftware-defined networks enable the use of distributed network configurations, and traditional networks are centralized.
  • CTraditional networks use dynamic access lists, and software-defined networks need individual hardware to be programmed.
  • DTraditional networks provide centralized network management, and software-defined networks rely on devices.

How the community answered

(34 responses)
  • A
    88% (30)
  • B
    6% (2)
  • C
    3% (1)
  • D
    3% (1)

Why each option

Software-defined networks (SDNs) offer programmatic control through APIs, while traditional networks primarily rely on device-specific, hardware-based configurations.

ASoftware-defined networks support the use of Intent APIs, and traditional networks are typically hardware-based.Correct

Software-defined networks (SDNs) abstract the control plane from the data plane, allowing for programmatic control and automation through APIs, including Intent APIs which express desired network behavior. Traditional networks, in contrast, rely heavily on manual configuration of individual hardware devices and their specific operating systems.

BSoftware-defined networks enable the use of distributed network configurations, and traditional networks are centralized.

Software-defined networks typically centralize control logic in a controller that then programs the distributed data plane, while traditional networks often involve distributed, per-device configurations.

CTraditional networks use dynamic access lists, and software-defined networks need individual hardware to be programmed.

While traditional networks can use dynamic access lists, the statement that 'software-defined networks need individual hardware to be programmed' is misleading as the SDN controller typically programs the hardware centrally, rather than requiring manual individual programming.

DTraditional networks provide centralized network management, and software-defined networks rely on devices.

This statement is reversed; software-defined networks provide centralized management through a controller, while traditional networks often rely on device-by-device configuration.

Concept tested: Traditional vs. Software-Defined Networking (SDN)

Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/enterprise-networks/software-defined-access/guide-c07-740702.html

Topics

#Traditional Networks#Software-Defined Networking#Network Architecture Comparison#Intent APIs

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 300-435 Practice