Cisco
300-425 · Question #81
An engineer is trying to determine the most cost-effective way to deploy high availability for a campus enterprise wireless network that currently leverages three wireless LAN controllers. Which…
The correct answer is A. N+1 solution without SSO. N+N is not cost-effective and it is an 'extremely expensive solution, so it has to be one of the N+1 options to meet this requirement.
WLAN High Availability
Question
An engineer is trying to determine the most cost-effective way to deploy high availability for a campus enterprise wireless network that currently leverages three wireless LAN controllers. Which architecture should the engineer deploy?
Options
- AN+1 solution without SSO
- BN+1 with SSO
- CN+N solution without SSO
- DN+N with SSO
How the community answered
(21 responses)- A76% (16)
- B5% (1)
- C5% (1)
- D14% (3)
Explanation
N+N is not cost-effective and it is an 'extremely expensive solution, so it has to be one of the N+1 options to meet this requirement.
Topics
#N+1 redundancy#SSO#controller HA#cost optimization
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.