300-425 · Question #273
Which design consideration is most important for real-time applications such as voice and video over WLAN?
The correct answer is B. Low latency and jitter. Voice and video are real-time, delay-sensitive applications that degrade noticeably with high latency or variable delay (jitter), making those metrics the top WLAN design priority.
Question
Which design consideration is most important for real-time applications such as voice and video over WLAN?
Options
- AHigh data rates
- BLow latency and jitter
- CMaximum throughput
- DUse of DFS channels
How the community answered
(26 responses)- A4% (1)
- B92% (24)
- C4% (1)
Why each option
Voice and video are real-time, delay-sensitive applications that degrade noticeably with high latency or variable delay (jitter), making those metrics the top WLAN design priority.
High data rates improve throughput but do not guarantee the consistent, low-delay delivery that voice and video codecs require to avoid degradation.
Real-time audio and video streams require consistent, predictable packet delivery; excessive latency causes audible or visible delay while jitter causes choppy playback. WLAN designs for these applications must implement QoS mechanisms such as WMM to prioritize voice/video queues and minimize queuing delay and jitter.
Maximum aggregate throughput is a bulk-transfer concern; real-time streams use relatively low and fixed bit rates and are far more sensitive to delay and jitter than to total bandwidth.
DFS channels help avoid radar interference and can reduce congestion, but selecting DFS channels is a spectrum planning consideration, not the primary design factor for latency-sensitive applications.
Concept tested: QoS requirements for voice and video over WLAN
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Mobility/vowlan/41dg/vowlan41dg-book.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.