300-425 · Question #184
Refer to the exhibit. A network engineer has identified that during a recent controller failure, several APs failed over to the tertiary controller instead of the secondary controller. The…
The correct answer is A. The secondary controller was at capacity. The issue where APs failed over to the tertiary controller instead of the secondary controller during a controller failure is likely due to the secondary controller being at capacity. When a controller reaches its maximum capacity, it cannot accept any additional APs, causing…
Question
Refer to the exhibit. A network engineer has identified that during a recent controller failure, several APs failed over to the tertiary controller instead of the secondary controller. The configuration from one of the APs is provided. Which design consideration led to the issue?
Exhibit
Options
- AThe secondary controller was at capacity.
- BThe secondary controller is an SSO configuration.
- CThe tertiary controller is an HA-SKU controller, so it took priority.
- DThe tertiary controller is in the same subnet as the primary controller.
How the community answered
(50 responses)- A64% (32)
- B6% (3)
- C10% (5)
- D20% (10)
Explanation
The issue where APs failed over to the tertiary controller instead of the secondary controller during a controller failure is likely due to the secondary controller being at capacity. When a controller reaches its maximum capacity, it cannot accept any additional APs, causing them to failover to the next available controller in the high availability configuration.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.