300-415 · Question #381
Which requirement must be met before deploying data redundancy elimination in SD-WAN?
The correct answer is A. Ensure that routing is symmetric between locations. For effective Data Redundancy Elimination (DRE) in SD-WAN, it is crucial to ensure that routing is symmetric between locations, as DRE operates by analyzing and optimizing both forward and reverse traffic flows.
Question
Options
- AEnsure that routing is symmetric between locations.
- BDisable shaping in the queue assigned for the application.
- CEnsure that traffic is sent through a GRE tunnel
- DCreate a DRE feature template in vManage
How the community answered
(46 responses)- A93% (43)
- B4% (2)
- D2% (1)
Why each option
For effective Data Redundancy Elimination (DRE) in SD-WAN, it is crucial to ensure that routing is symmetric between locations, as DRE operates by analyzing and optimizing both forward and reverse traffic flows.
Data Redundancy Elimination (DRE) works by identifying and eliminating duplicate data patterns in traffic streams. For DRE to function optimally and detect redundancies effectively across a communication path, it requires symmetric routing to ensure both forward and reverse traffic flows traverse the same DRE-enabled devices.
Disabling shaping might be a QoS consideration, but it's not a prerequisite for the fundamental operation of data redundancy elimination.
While GRE tunnels can be part of an SD-WAN underlay, DRE is an optimization feature that works over the SD-WAN tunnels (often IPsec), and specifically requiring GRE tunnels is not a general prerequisite for DRE.
While a DRE feature template is required to configure and enable DRE on devices, this is a configuration step, not a fundamental networking requirement that must be met before deployment, like symmetric routing.
Concept tested: SD-WAN Data Redundancy Elimination prerequisites
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/sdwan/configuration/sdwan-xe-gs-book/m-data-redundancy-elimination.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.