300-415 · Question #211
An engineer must configure local redundancy on a site. Which configuration accomplishes the task?
The correct answer is D. tloc-extension interface interface-name vpn 0 tloc-extension interface-name. To configure local redundancy on a site between two WAN Edge routers, the tloc-extension interface command is used, specifying the interface name, followed by configuring the same under vpn 0.
Question
Options
- Avpn 0 tloc-extension interface interface-name
- Binterface interface-name tloc-extension
- Ctloc-extension interface interface-name vpn 0 interface interface-name tloc-extension interface-name
- Dtloc-extension interface interface-name vpn 0 tloc-extension interface-name
How the community answered
(35 responses)- B6% (2)
- C3% (1)
- D91% (32)
Why each option
To configure local redundancy on a site between two WAN Edge routers, the tloc-extension interface command is used, specifying the interface name, followed by configuring the same under vpn 0.
This configuration is incomplete and places 'tloc-extension interface' directly under 'vpn 0', which is not the correct syntax for defining the extension.
This syntax is incorrect; 'tloc-extension' is a global command or used under 'vpn 0', not directly under an 'interface' configuration in this context for redundancy.
This option includes redundant and incorrectly placed commands, such as 'interface interface-name tloc-extension interface-name', which is not valid for configuring TLOC-extension redundancy.
To configure local redundancy between two WAN Edge routers at the same site, the 'tloc-extension interface <interface-name>' command is used globally and then referenced within 'vpn 0' using 'tloc-extension <interface-name>'. This creates a logical connection between the WAN Edges, allowing them to share TLOCs and provide redundancy.
Concept tested: TLOC-extension for local redundancy
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/sdwan/configuration/sdwan-xe-gs-book/sdwan-overlay-network.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.