An engineer must deploy a QoS policy with these requirements: policy name: App-police CIR rate: 1000000 burst: 1000000 exceed: drop Which configuration meets the requirements?

This snippet applies a policer within a centralized data policy for traffic matching an app-list. While conceptually correct for applying a policer, it's less general than B for meeting the stated requirements that just mention "App-police" without an app-list match in the policer definition itself.

This snippet shows the correct structure for applying a policer named `App-police` within a centralized data policy. A centralized data policy (defined under `policy data-policy policy-name`) allows you to apply actions like policing to traffic flows across specified VPNs (`vpn-list 10`) based on defined sequences. Although the policer definition itself (`CIR rate`, `burst`, `exceed`) is not shown in this specific snippet, this structure is the correct way to reference and apply a pre-defined policer.

This snippet shows a localized policer applied on a specific interface (`ge0/0`) within a VPN, which is a localized policy application. The question implies a QoS policy to be *deployed*, and centralized data policies are the primary way to deploy traffic policies across the fabric based on criteria like application or VPN, not just a single interface.

This snippet is too generic and lacks the context of a data policy or its application to specific VPNs or traffic flows. A policer needs to be defined and then applied within a broader policy framework, typically a data policy.