Refer to the exhibit. An engineer is troubleshooting non-802.11 interference and observes the shown output. Which interference signature is the most harmful to Wi-Fi?

Cordless phones are problematic but often employ frequency hopping or operate with lower power, causing intermittent and localized interference rather than constant, wide-ranging disruption.

Microwave ovens generate very strong interference but are pulsed and typically operate for short durations, allowing Wi-Fi to sometimes recover during their inactive periods.

A 2.4 GHz wideband jammer is highly disruptive as it blankets a wide range of frequencies, but analog video cameras are often considered more consistently detrimental due to their fixed-frequency, continuous wave nature.

FHSS Bluetooth devices use frequency hopping and relatively low power, designed to coexist with Wi-Fi, making their impact generally less severe than strong, continuous interferers.

Analog video cameras operating in the 2.4 GHz band are often cited as the most harmful non-802.11 interferers because they typically transmit continuously at a fixed frequency and high power. This effectively saturates a Wi-Fi channel (or channels), making them completely unusable for 802.11 communication for extended periods.