nerdexam
Cisco

300-365 · Question #174

An engineer has deployed two Cisco 2504 WLCs to support the wireless network in two newly added buildings on a campus. The engineer puts 70 APs in the first building on one WLC and 70 APs in the…

The correct answer is A. It minimizes inter-controller roaming of clients. Placing all APs in each building on a dedicated WLC keeps client roaming within each building as intra-controller roaming, which minimizes the slower and more complex inter-controller roaming events.

Mobility Deployment

Question

An engineer has deployed two Cisco 2504 WLCs to support the wireless network in two newly added buildings on a campus. The engineer puts 70 APs in the first building on one WLC and 70 APs in the second building on the other Cisco 2504 WLC. Which result does this design achieve?

Options

  • AIt minimizes inter-controller roaming of clients.
  • BIn ensures that the number of clients does not exceed the maximum limit of 70 on Cisco 2504
  • CIt minimizes intra-controller roaming of clients.
  • DIn ensures that the number of APs does not exceed the maximum limit of 70 on Cisco 2504

How the community answered

(32 responses)
  • A
    81% (26)
  • B
    6% (2)
  • C
    9% (3)
  • D
    3% (1)

Why each option

Placing all APs in each building on a dedicated WLC keeps client roaming within each building as intra-controller roaming, which minimizes the slower and more complex inter-controller roaming events.

AIt minimizes inter-controller roaming of clients.Correct

When all APs in Building 1 are on WLC1 and all APs in Building 2 are on WLC2, clients moving between APs within the same building perform intra-controller roaming, which is handled locally and is seamless. Inter-controller roaming is minimized because clients would only cross controller boundaries when physically moving between the two buildings, which is a rare event.

BIn ensures that the number of clients does not exceed the maximum limit of 70 on Cisco 2504

The Cisco 2504 WLC supports a maximum of 75 APs, not 70, so the stated maximum limit of 70 is factually incorrect.

CIt minimizes intra-controller roaming of clients.

Concentrating all building APs on one WLC actually maximizes intra-controller roaming within that building rather than minimizing it.

DIn ensures that the number of APs does not exceed the maximum limit of 70 on Cisco 2504

The Cisco 2504 WLC maximum AP limit is 75, not 70, making this statement factually incorrect about the platform's capacity.

Concept tested: Cisco 2504 WLC AP capacity and inter-controller roaming design

Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/2500-series-wireless-controllers/data_sheet_c78-598388.html

Topics

#inter-controller roaming#WLC design#controller placement#Cisco 2504

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 300-365 Practice