Which answer about PE-CE routing design is correct in a Layer 3 MPLS VPN environment?

Question

Options

• AEIGRP has the built-in capability to stop a routing loop when there is a backdoor link between the
• BBGP, along with SoO, can stop the routing loop when there is a backdoor link between the CE
• COSPF does not support a PE-CE design when there is a backdoor link between the CE routers.
• DEIGRP does not support a PE-CE design when there is a backdoor link between the CE routers.

• A
  4% (1)
• B
  57% (16)
• C
  29% (8)
• D
  11% (3)

Explanation

When CE routers at different VPN sites have a backdoor link between them, routing loops can form: a route learned over the MPLS backbone could be re-advertised back into the backbone via the backdoor link. BGP with the Site of Origin (SoO) extended community (B) solves this by tagging routes with the site that originated them; the PE router drops any route that returns to its originating site. EIGRP (A) does not have a built-in backdoor loop prevention mechanism and requires SoO as well. OSPF (C) can support PE-CE with backdoor links using sham-links, so it is not unsupported. EIGRP (D) can also work with PE-CE and backdoor links when configured with SoO - it is not inherently unsupported.

No community discussion yet for this question.