300-320 · Question #537
While designing a QoS policy for an organization, a network engineer is determining the method to limit the output rate of traffic whit in the real-time queue. How must the limiting of traffic…
The correct answer is B. The traffic must be policed and not allowed to pass. Real-time traffic (voice, video) is placed in a Low-Latency Queue (LLQ) or Priority Queue (PQ) and given strict priority scheduling. When traffic in the real-time queue exceeds its configured rate, it must be policed-meaning excess packets are dropped immediately. Shaping is…
Question
While designing a QoS policy for an organization, a network engineer is determining the method to limit the output rate of traffic whit in the real-time queue. How must the limiting of traffic within the real-time queue occur?
Options
- AThe traffic must be remarked to a low priority to and allowed pass
- BThe traffic must be policed and not allowed to pass
- CThe traffic within the real-time queue must not be limited
- DThe traffic must be shaped to allow for it to be transmitted after the tokens have been replenished
How the community answered
(24 responses)- A13% (3)
- B79% (19)
- C4% (1)
- D4% (1)
Explanation
Real-time traffic (voice, video) is placed in a Low-Latency Queue (LLQ) or Priority Queue (PQ) and given strict priority scheduling. When traffic in the real-time queue exceeds its configured rate, it must be policed-meaning excess packets are dropped immediately. Shaping is explicitly wrong here because shaping buffers excess packets in a queue and retransmits them later; this introduces variable delay (jitter) that destroys real-time application quality. Remarking and passing traffic would allow the rate to be exceeded. Therefore, policing with a drop action is the only correct method to enforce rate limits on real-time queues without causing jitter.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.