300-220 · Question #22
Identifying analytical gaps using threat hunting methodologies helps in:
The correct answer is C. Pinpointing areas for process improvement. Identifying analytical gaps through threat hunting methodologies reveals weaknesses in detection coverage, data sources, and investigative processes - directly pinpointing areas for process improvement (C), which allows security teams to mature their capabilities over time. Why…
Question
Identifying analytical gaps using threat hunting methodologies helps in:
Options
- AReducing the efficiency of the threat hunting team
- BIncreasing the time to detect threats
- CPinpointing areas for process improvement
- DDecreasing data visibility
How the community answered
(18 responses)- B6% (1)
- C94% (17)
Explanation
Identifying analytical gaps through threat hunting methodologies reveals weaknesses in detection coverage, data sources, and investigative processes - directly pinpointing areas for process improvement (C), which allows security teams to mature their capabilities over time.
Why the distractors are wrong:
- A is the opposite of reality - finding gaps makes teams more efficient, not less.
- B is also inverted - gap identification leads to faster detection by closing blind spots.
- D contradicts the goal entirely - addressing gaps typically increases data visibility, not decreases it.
Memory tip: Think of gap analysis as a map of blind spots. You can't improve what you can't see, so finding the gaps = finding what to fix. All three wrong answers describe negative outcomes, but threat hunting is a proactive improvement activity - if a choice sounds like it makes security worse, it's wrong.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.