nerdexam
Cisco

300-215 · Question #42

A security team needs to prevent a remote code execution vulnerability. The vulnerability can be exploited only by sending '${' string in the HTTP request. WAF rule is blocking '${', but system…

The correct answer is A. Enable URL decoding on WAF. Attackers can URL-encode the ${ sequence (e.g. %24%7B) to bypass a literal string block. Enabling URL decoding ensures the WAF normalizes and inspects decoded payloads, catching the ${ before it reaches the application.

Submitted by viktor_hu· Mar 6, 2026Incident Response Techniques

Question

A security team needs to prevent a remote code execution vulnerability. The vulnerability can be exploited only by sending ‘${‘ string in the HTTP request. WAF rule is blocking ‘${‘, but system engineers detect that attackers are executing commands on the host anyway. Which action should the security team recommend?

Options

  • AEnable URL decoding on WAF.
  • BBlock incoming web traffic.
  • CAdd two WAF rules to block 'S' and '{' characters separately.
  • DDeploy antimalware solution.

How the community answered

(34 responses)
  • A
    76% (26)
  • B
    3% (1)
  • C
    15% (5)
  • D
    6% (2)

Explanation

Attackers can URL-encode the ${ sequence (e.g. %24%7B) to bypass a literal string block. Enabling URL decoding ensures the WAF normalizes and inspects decoded payloads, catching the ${ before it reaches the application.

Topics

#WAF bypass#URL encoding#remote code execution#vulnerability mitigation

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 300-215 Practice