300-070 · Question #183
Which statement about traffic policing and shaping is true?
The correct answer is C. Traffic policing and shaping help regulate bandwidth usage by limiting the amount of traffic. Traffic policing and traffic shaping are both QoS mechanisms that regulate bandwidth usage by limiting the rate of traffic - this is what makes Option C correct and the best general statement about both. The key distinction is HOW they handle excess traffic: policing drops or…
Question
Which statement about traffic policing and shaping is true?
Options
- AShaping limits traffic rates by dropping, re-marking, or transmitting traffic.
- BPolicing involves regulating excessive traffic rates by delaying (that is, buffering) traffic.
- CTraffic policing and shaping help regulate bandwidth usage by limiting the amount of traffic.
- DTraffic policing is more suitable for lower-speed links such as Multilink PPP and Frame Relay, as
How the community answered
(24 responses)- A4% (1)
- B4% (1)
- C92% (22)
Explanation
Traffic policing and traffic shaping are both QoS mechanisms that regulate bandwidth usage by limiting the rate of traffic - this is what makes Option C correct and the best general statement about both. The key distinction is HOW they handle excess traffic: policing drops or re-marks packets that exceed the defined rate (no buffering), while shaping buffers excess packets to smooth the traffic rate over time. Option A is wrong because it describes policing behavior (drop/re-mark), not shaping. Option B is wrong because it describes shaping behavior (buffering/delaying), not policing. Option D is wrong because traffic shaping (not policing) is more appropriate for slower links like Frame Relay due to its buffering nature.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.