When working with VM-VM DRS rules (affinity/anti-affinity), which statement is correct?

The correct answer is A. DRS gives higher priority to preventing violations of affinity rules than violations of anti-affinity. When two VM-VM affinity rules conflict, the older one takes precedence and the newer rule is disabled. DRS only tries to satisfy enabled rules and disabled rules are ignored. DRS gives higher precedence to preventing violations of anti-affinity rules than violations of affinity r

Section 5 – Administer and Protect vSphere 6.5 Resources

Question

Options

ADRS gives higher priority to preventing violations of affinity rules than violations of anti-affinity
BDRS gives the same priority to preventing violations of anti-affinity rules as affinity rules.
CDRS does not allow both affinity and anti-affinity rules to be enabled at the same time within a
DDRS gives higher priority to preventing violations of anti-affinity rules than violations of affinity

How the community answered

(63 responses)

A
71% (45)
B
8% (5)
C
16% (10)
D
5% (3)

Explanation

When two VM-VM affinity rules conflict, the older one takes precedence and the newer rule is disabled. DRS only tries to satisfy enabled rules and disabled rules are ignored. DRS gives higher precedence to preventing violations of anti-affinity rules than violations of affinity rules.

Topics

#DRS VM-VM rules#affinity rules#anti-affinity rules#rule priority

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 2V0-622 Practice