2V0-62.23 · Question #8
Refer to the exhibit. During Directory Sync and Authentication configuration, which two options are selectable for the Administrator in the User Name pull down menu? (Choose two.)
The correct answer is B. sAMAccountName C. UserPrincipalName. When configuring Directory Sync and Authentication (typically in a product like Palo Alto Networks), the Administrator's User Name field accepts formats that are standard, human-readable Active Directory login identifiers. sAMAccountName (B) is the classic pre-Windows 2000…
Question
Refer to the exhibit. During Directory Sync and Authentication configuration, which two options are selectable for the Administrator in the User Name pull down menu? (Choose two.)
Exhibit
Options
- AdistinguishedName
- BsAMAccountName
- CUserPrincipalName
- DUserName
- ESID
How the community answered
(51 responses)- A2% (1)
- B94% (48)
- D4% (2)
Explanation
When configuring Directory Sync and Authentication (typically in a product like Palo Alto Networks), the Administrator's User Name field accepts formats that are standard, human-readable Active Directory login identifiers. sAMAccountName (B) is the classic pre-Windows 2000 login name (e.g., jsmith), and UserPrincipalName (C) is the UPN email-style login (e.g., [email protected]) - both are practical, widely-used formats for authenticating a service/admin account against Active Directory.
distinguishedName (A) is wrong because it's a full LDAP path (e.g., CN=jsmith,OU=Admins,DC=corp,DC=com) used to locate objects in the directory tree, not to authenticate with them. UserName (D) is not a real Active Directory attribute - it's a generic term, not a valid AD field. SID (E) is a binary Security Identifier used internally by Windows for access control, not a human-usable login credential.
Memory tip: Think of it as "how would a person actually type their username to log in?" - SAM (jsmith) and UPN ([email protected]) are both things a human types; DNs, SIDs, and made-up fields are not.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.
