2V0-13.24 · Question #76
A customer has a requirement to improve bandwidth and reliability for traffic that is routed through the NSX Edges in VMware Cloud Foundation. What should the architect recommend satisfying this…
The correct answer is D. Configure a LAG Group for NSX Edges. In VCF, NSX Edges handle north-south traffic, and improving bandwidth and reliability involves optimizing their network connectivity. Option D, "Configure a LAG Group for NSX Edges," uses Link Aggregation Groups (LAG) to bundle multiple physical links, increasing bandwidth and…
Question
A customer has a requirement to improve bandwidth and reliability for traffic that is routed through the NSX Edges in VMware Cloud Foundation. What should the architect recommend satisfying this requirement?
Options
- AConfigure a Load balanced Group for NSX Edges
- BConfigure a TEP Group for NSX Edges
- CConfigure a TEP Independent Group for NSX Edges
- DConfigure a LAG Group for NSX Edges
How the community answered
(44 responses)- A16% (7)
- B9% (4)
- C5% (2)
- D70% (31)
Explanation
In VCF, NSX Edges handle north-south traffic, and improving bandwidth and reliability involves optimizing their network connectivity. Option D, "Configure a LAG Group for NSX Edges," uses Link Aggregation Groups (LAG) to bundle multiple physical links, increasing bandwidth and providing redundancy via failover if a link fails. This aligns with NSX-T 3.2 capabilities in VCF 5.2 for edge nodes, directly addressing the requirement. Option A (load balancing) could distribute traffic but doesn't inherently improve physical link reliability, while B and C (TEP groups) relate to host-level Tunnel Endpoints, not edge traffic. LAG is a standard NSX recommendation for such
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.