2V0-13.24 · Question #5
A company will be expanding their existing VCF environment for a new application. The existing VCF environment currently has a management domain and two separate VI workload domains with different…
The correct answer is B. A new Workload domain with hardware supporting the memory requirements of the new. The requirements demand memory capacity, licensing control, cost approval, and isolation. Option B, "A new Workload domain with hardware supporting the memory requirements," satisfies all: a new VI domain in VCF 5.2 isolates workloads (via separate NSX instance), uses approved…
Question
A company will be expanding their existing VCF environment for a new application. The existing VCF environment currently has a management domain and two separate VI workload domains with different hardware profiles. The new application has the following requirements:
- The application will use significantly more memory than current
workloads today.
- The application will have a limited number of licenses to run on
hosts.
- Additional VCF and hardware costs have been approved for the
application.
- The application will contain confidential customer information that
requires isolation from other workloads. What design recommendation should the administrator document?
Options
- ADeploy a new consolidated VCF instance and deploy the new application into it.
- BA new Workload domain with hardware supporting the memory requirements of the new
- CEnough identical hardware for the management domain should be ordered to accommodate the
- DPurchase enough matching hardware to accommodate the new application's memory
How the community answered
(24 responses)- A13% (3)
- B71% (17)
- C4% (1)
- D13% (3)
Explanation
The requirements demand memory capacity, licensing control, cost approval, and isolation. Option B, "A new Workload domain with hardware supporting the memory requirements," satisfies all: a new VI domain in VCF 5.2 isolates workloads (via separate NSX instance), uses approved funds for high-memory hardware, and allows licensing via DRS affinity rules within the domain. Option A (new VCF instance) is overkill, duplicating management overhead. Option C (management domain hardware) misuses the management domain's purpose. Option D (expanding existing cluster) risks isolation breaches. B leverages VCF's workload domain architecture effectively.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.