nerdexam
CompTIA

220-802 · Question #932

Which of the following will allow a company to implement the MOST cost-efficient way to easily identify whether a user has secure access to particular areas of a building?

The correct answer is A. Require badges. Badges are the most cost-efficient physical access control method because they are inexpensive to produce and manage at scale while providing visible, auditable identification for secured areas.

Hardware

Question

Which of the following will allow a company to implement the MOST cost-efficient way to easily identify whether a user has secure access to particular areas of a building?

Options

  • ARequire badges
  • BInstall retina scanners
  • CInstall firewalls
  • DRequire key fobs

How the community answered

(45 responses)
  • A
    76% (34)
  • B
    2% (1)
  • C
    16% (7)
  • D
    7% (3)

Why each option

Badges are the most cost-efficient physical access control method because they are inexpensive to produce and manage at scale while providing visible, auditable identification for secured areas.

ARequire badgesCorrect

Access badges - particularly smart card or proximity card badges - are low-cost per unit, easy to issue and revoke, and can be integrated with electronic door readers to log entry events for auditing. They provide a balance of cost efficiency and security that scales easily across an organization without requiring specialized hardware at every access point. This makes badges the most practical and widely adopted solution for identifying and controlling access to secured building areas.

BInstall retina scanners

Retina scanners are expensive biometric devices with high per-unit hardware costs, specialized installation requirements, and ongoing maintenance overhead, making them cost-prohibitive for most organizations.

CInstall firewalls

Firewalls are network security devices that control data traffic between networks and have no function in identifying or authorizing a person's physical access to a building.

DRequire key fobs

Key fobs, particularly hardware TOTP tokens, have a higher per-unit cost than proximity badges and must be replaced periodically, making them less cost-efficient than standard badge systems for physical building access.

Concept tested: Cost-efficient physical access control identification methods

Source: https://www.nist.gov/publications/guidelines-personal-identification-verification-piv-credentials-federal-agencies

Topics

#physical security#access badges#building access control#cost efficiency

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 220-802 Practice