A virtual server at 10.10.1.100:80 has the rule listed below applied. when HTTP_REQUEST { if {[HTTP::uri] ends_with "htm" } { pool pool1 } elseif {[HTTP::uri] ends_with "xt" } { pool pool2 } If a

This pool would be selected only if the request URI ended with 'htm', which is not implied by the correct answer.

Assuming the complete question implies a URI that ends with 'xt' (e.g., '/document.xt'), the iRule's `elseif` condition `[HTTP::uri] ends_with 'xt'` would evaluate as true, directing the request to `pool2`.

The iRule explicitly provides `pool` commands for both `if` and `elseif` conditions, ensuring the request is directed to a pool if either condition is met, rather than being dropped.

While the question is truncated, the iRule's logic is clear: if the URI ends with 'htm' it goes to pool1, otherwise if it ends with 'xt' it goes to pool2, meaning the pool can be determined if the URI is known.