nerdexam
F5

201 · Question #208

Refer to the exhibit. During a planned upgrade lo a BIG-IP HA pair running Active/Standby, an outage to application traffic is reported shortly after the Active unit is forced to Standby Reverting…

The correct answer is A. The Tag voice on the Standby device. An outage occurred when an Active BIG-IP unit was forced to Standby, indicating a problem with the Standby unit's ability to properly take over as the Active device for application traffic.

Section 6: Configure High Availability

Question

Refer to the exhibit. During a planned upgrade lo a BIG-IP HA pair running Active/Standby, an outage to application traffic is reported shortly after the Active unit is forced to Standby Reverting the flower resolves the outage. What should the BIG-IP Administrator modify to avoid an outage during the next for over event?

Options

  • AThe Tag voice on the Standby device
  • BThe interface on the Active device to 1.1
  • CThe Tag value on the Active device
  • DThe Interface on the Standby device to 1.1

How the community answered

(24 responses)
  • A
    50% (12)
  • B
    13% (3)
  • C
    8% (2)
  • D
    29% (7)

Why each option

An outage occurred when an Active BIG-IP unit was forced to Standby, indicating a problem with the Standby unit's ability to properly take over as the Active device for application traffic.

AThe Tag voice on the Standby deviceCorrect

In F5 HA configurations, 'Tag value' (often related to HA groups or failover preferences/priorities) on a device influences its behavior and ability to take over traffic groups during a failover. If the Standby device's tag value is improperly configured or too low, it might not correctly assume the Active role and process traffic, leading to an outage.

BThe interface on the Active device to 1.1

The issue occurred when the Active unit became Standby; modifying the Active unit's interface would not resolve a problem with the *newly active* (formerly Standby) device.

CThe Tag value on the Active device

Modifying the Tag value on the *already working* Active device is not the solution for an outage caused by the *Standby* device failing to perform correctly when it became Active.

DThe Interface on the Standby device to 1.1

While an interface misconfiguration on the Standby device could cause an outage, simply changing 'the Interface to 1.1' is too vague and less directly related to failover logic than modifying a 'Tag value' that dictates HA behavior.

Concept tested: F5 BIG-IP HA failover configuration and priorities

Source: https://techdocs.f5.com/en-us/bigip-15-0-0/big-ip-device-service-clustering-administration/about-ha-groups.html

Topics

#HA failover#Active/Standby#VLAN tag#network configuration

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 201 Practice