Riverbed
201-01 · Question #89
What is lost by using sFlow and not NetFlow for Cascade?
The correct answer is B. A loss of granularity as sFlow is sampled and doesn't see every packet of a conversation. See the full explanation below for the reasoning.
Question
What is lost by using sFlow and not NetFlow for Cascade?
Options
- ANothing; sFlow actually provides better data to Cascade since it is sampled packets and not just
- BA loss of granularity as sFlow is sampled and doesn't see every packet of a conversation.
- CSince Cascade takes the sampling rate of sFlow into account, nothing is lost.
- DsFlow should be configured to obtain granularity.
How the community answered
(23 responses)- A4% (1)
- B74% (17)
- C9% (2)
- D13% (3)
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.