What is a principle of a code review process?

The correct answer is C. Naming standards must be consistent.. Consistent naming standards are a core principle of code reviews. Reviews check that code adheres to team conventions including variable names, function names, file naming, and formatting standards, ensuring the codebase remains readable and maintainable. Option A is incorrect be

Software Development and Design

Question

Options

AChanges are made after the code is submitted to source control.
BIt must not prevent code from getting into production as quickly as possible.
CNaming standards must be consistent.
DA technical lead must sign off on the review.

How the community answered

(50 responses)

A
4% (2)
B
2% (1)
C
92% (46)
D
2% (1)

Explanation

Consistent naming standards are a core principle of code reviews. Reviews check that code adheres to team conventions including variable names, function names, file naming, and formatting standards, ensuring the codebase remains readable and maintainable. Option A is incorrect because code review happens before the code is committed or merged, not after. Option B is incorrect because ensuring quality in review may intentionally slow deployment to prevent bad code from reaching production. Option D is incorrect because code review does not mandate a technical lead - any qualified peer can perform a review.

Topics

#Code Review#Coding Standards#Code Quality#Software Development Best Practices

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 200-901 Practice