CiscoCisco
200-301 · Question #869
200-301 Question #869: Real Exam Question with Answer & Explanation
The correct answer is D: TCP sends an acknowledgement for every packet received: UDP operates without. UDP is more suitable for low-latency applications like VoIP because it operates without the overhead of acknowledgments and retransmissions, unlike TCP, which prioritizes guaranteed delivery.
Submitted by brentm· Mar 5, 2026DOMAIN_LIST_NOT_PROVIDED
Question
Why is UDP more suitable than TCP for applications that require low latency such as VoIP?
Options
- AUDP reliably guarantees delivery of all packets: TCP drops packets under heavy load
- BUDP uses sequencing data for packets to arrive in order TCP offers the capability to receive
- CTCP uses congestion control for efficient packet delivery: UDP uses flow control mechanisms for
- DTCP sends an acknowledgement for every packet received: UDP operates without
Explanation
UDP is more suitable for low-latency applications like VoIP because it operates without the overhead of acknowledgments and retransmissions, unlike TCP, which prioritizes guaranteed delivery.
Common mistakes.
- A. This statement is incorrect; UDP does not reliably guarantee delivery of all packets, and while TCP can drop packets, its primary goal is reliable delivery through retransmission.
- B. This statement is incorrect; TCP uses sequencing to ensure in-order delivery, whereas UDP does not inherently provide sequencing.
- C. This statement is incorrect; TCP uses both congestion control and flow control, while UDP generally lacks these sophisticated mechanisms, contributing to its lower overhead and suitability for real-time traffic.
Concept tested. UDP advantages for low-latency applications
Topics
#TCP acknowledgements#UDP connectionless#VoIP requirements
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.