200-301 · Question #1013
Why implement VRRP?
The correct answer is B. To provide end users with a virtual gateway in a multivendor network. VRRP is implemented to provide a highly available default gateway for end users by allowing multiple routers to share a single virtual IP and MAC address, especially in multivendor network environments.
Question
Options
- ATo hand over to end users the autodiscovery of virtual gateways
- BTo provide end users with a virtual gateway in a multivendor network
- CTo leverage a weighting scheme to provide uninterrupted service
- DTo detect link failures without the overhead of Bidirectional Forwarding Detection
How the community answered
(58 responses)- A2% (1)
- B93% (54)
- C2% (1)
- D3% (2)
Why each option
VRRP is implemented to provide a highly available default gateway for end users by allowing multiple routers to share a single virtual IP and MAC address, especially in multivendor network environments.
VRRP does not provide autodiscovery of virtual gateways to end users; it provides a fixed virtual gateway IP that end users are statically configured to use or obtain via DHCP.
VRRP is a First Hop Redundancy Protocol (FHRP) designed to provide default gateway redundancy for end users; it allows multiple routers to act as a single virtual router, sharing a virtual IP and MAC address, and being an open standard, it is suitable for multivendor networks.
While VRRP contributes to uninterrupted service, it uses a priority scheme for active/standby election, not a weighting scheme in the same way some other protocols might use to influence traffic paths or load balancing.
VRRP itself has its own robust failure detection mechanisms and is not primarily implemented to avoid the overhead of BFD; BFD can be integrated with VRRP for faster detection, but VRRP is not a replacement for BFD.
Concept tested: VRRP functionality and benefits
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipapp_fhrp/configuration/xe-3s/fhrp-xe-3s-book/fhrp-vrrp-v3.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.