200-155 · Question #159
What are two benefits of blade servers as compared to rack servers? (Choose two.)
The correct answer is B. fewer cables E. lower initial cost of one server. Blade servers offer a more compact and integrated solution compared to rack servers, leading to benefits in cabling reduction and potentially lower per-server costs in a dense environment.
Question
What are two benefits of blade servers as compared to rack servers? (Choose two.)
Options
- Ahigher performance
- Bfewer cables
- CEasier to provision
- Dmore disk space
- Elower initial cost of one server
How the community answered
(25 responses)- A4% (1)
- B92% (23)
- D4% (1)
Why each option
Blade servers offer a more compact and integrated solution compared to rack servers, leading to benefits in cabling reduction and potentially lower per-server costs in a dense environment.
Server performance is primarily determined by components like CPU, RAM, and storage, not the physical form factor, so blade servers do not inherently offer higher performance than comparable rack servers.
Blade servers consolidate power, cooling, and networking components within a shared chassis, which significantly reduces the number of individual power, network, and storage cables required per server blade.
Provisioning blade servers requires configuring the shared chassis infrastructure and individual blades, which can be more complex than provisioning a single, self-contained rack server.
Blade servers are designed for high density and often have fewer internal drive bays than larger rack servers, which typically offer more disk space for internal storage.
While the initial cost of a fully populated blade chassis can be high, the cost per individual server blade, once amortized over the shared chassis infrastructure, is often lower than the equivalent cost of a standalone rack server.
Concept tested: Blade vs. Rack Server Benefits
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.