200-101 · Question #175
A network administrator receives an error message while trying to configure the Ethernet interface of a router with IP address 10.24.24.24/29. Which statement explains the reason for this issue?
The correct answer is B. This address is a network address.. 10.24.24.24 with a /29 prefix cannot be assigned to a router interface because it falls exactly on a subnet boundary, making it a network address rather than a valid host address.
Question
Options
- AVLSM-capable routing protocols must be enabled first on the router.
- BThis address is a network address.
- CThis address is a broadcast address.
- DThe Ethernet interface is faulty.
How the community answered
(24 responses)- A4% (1)
- B75% (18)
- C8% (2)
- D13% (3)
Why each option
10.24.24.24 with a /29 prefix cannot be assigned to a router interface because it falls exactly on a subnet boundary, making it a network address rather than a valid host address.
VLSM capability is a property of routing protocols used to advertise subnet information, not a prerequisite for assigning an IP address to an interface; the error is caused by the address value itself.
A /29 prefix corresponds to subnet mask 255.255.255.248, which creates subnets in increments of 8 within the last octet. The subnet boundaries are .0, .8, .16, .24, .32, and so on - meaning 10.24.24.24 is exactly the network address of the 10.24.24.24/29 subnet. The valid host range for this subnet is 10.24.24.25 through 10.24.24.30, with 10.24.24.31 as the broadcast address.
The broadcast address for the 10.24.24.24/29 subnet is 10.24.24.31 - the last address in the block - not 10.24.24.24.
The router returned a software configuration error related to an invalid IP address, which is an addressing logic issue and has nothing to do with the physical state of the Ethernet interface.
Concept tested: IPv4 /29 subnet boundary and network address identification
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/routing-information-protocol-rip/13788-3.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.