200-101 · Question #139
Refer to the exhibit. HostA cannot ping HostB. Assuming routing is properly configured, what could be the cause of this problem?
The correct answer is D. The serial interfaces of the routers are not on the same subnet.. For two routers to forward packets between each other over a serial WAN link, both serial interfaces must reside on the same IP subnet. If RouterA's serial interface is on, for example, 192.168.1.1/30 and RouterB's serial interface is on 192.168.2.1/30, the routers cannot establi
Question
Options
- AHostA is not on the same subnet as its default gateway.
- BThe address of SwitchA is a subnet address.
- CThe Fa0/0 interface on RouterA is on a subnet that can't be used.
- DThe serial interfaces of the routers are not on the same subnet.
- EThe Fa0/0 interface on RouterB is using a broadcast address.
How the community answered
(25 responses)- B4% (1)
- C16% (4)
- D72% (18)
- E8% (2)
Explanation
For two routers to forward packets between each other over a serial WAN link, both serial interfaces must reside on the same IP subnet. If RouterA's serial interface is on, for example, 192.168.1.1/30 and RouterB's serial interface is on 192.168.2.1/30, the routers cannot establish Layer 3 connectivity between them, breaking the end-to-end path even when routing protocols are configured. Choices A and E would create local subnet issues but are stated as not being the problem here. Choice B (switch using a subnet address) and Choice C (Fa0/0 on an unusable subnet) are not supported by the described scenario. The key clue is that 'routing is properly configured,' meaning the serial link mismatch is the logical culprit.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.