The network administrator has been asked to give reasons for moving from IPv4 to IPv6. What are two valid reasons for adopting IPv6 over IPv4? (Choose two.)

IPv6 replaces broadcast with multicast and anycast, eliminating the bandwidth waste and CPU overhead caused by broadcast traffic flooding all nodes on a segment.

Changing the source address in the IPv6 header is not a distinct advantage over IPv4; both protocols use source addresses in their headers in functionally equivalent ways.

Changing the destination address in the IPv6 header is not an IPv6-specific advantage; destination addressing works similarly in both IPv4 and IPv6.

Whether ping requires a password is unrelated to the IPv6 protocol itself and is not a reason to adopt IPv6.

IPv6 supports Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC, RFC 4862), allowing hosts to automatically generate a global unicast address from the router-advertised prefix and their interface identifier without requiring a DHCP server.

NAT is an IPv4 workaround for address scarcity; IPv6's vast address space eliminates the need for NAT, so NAT is not an advantage of adopting IPv6.