Identify three statements that are true about reservations in back-to-back processing.

Question

Options

• APartial fulfillment of reservations is supported.
• BChanges to reservation in Oracle Logistics Cloud leads to exceptions, which are displayed in the
• CReservations cannot be created for back-to-back On Hand supply orders.
• DOne reservation is created for a demand and supply.
• EReservation supplies that can be reserved are Purchase Orders, Transfer Orders, Work Orders, and

Explanation

Note: The correct answer field appears blank in your question, and options B and E are truncated. Based on Oracle SCM Cloud documentation, the three correct statements are most likely B, D, and E.

In Oracle back-to-back processing, one reservation (D) is created to link a single demand (e.g., a sales order line) to a specific supply - this is the foundational mechanic of back-to-back fulfillment. Option E is correct because the valid supply types that can be reserved in back-to-back include Purchase Orders, Transfer Orders, Work Orders, and On Hand. Option B is correct because any change to a back-to-back reservation triggers exceptions, which are surfaced in the Back-to-Back Orders management page for review and action.

A is wrong because partial fulfillment of reservations is not supported in back-to-back processing - the reservation must be fulfilled in full, which is a key distinction from standard reservations. C is wrong because On Hand is a valid and supported supply source for back-to-back reservations (it's one of the types listed in E).

Memory tip: Think of back-to-back as a one-to-one locked chain - one demand, one supply, one reservation, fully committed, with any break in the chain raising a visible exception. The acronym "PTWO + H" (Purchase Order, Transfer Order, Work Order + On Hand) covers your valid supply types.

No community discussion yet for this question.