1Z0-888 · Question #31
What is the best method for monitoring Group Replication conflict resolution?
The correct answer is A. The PERFORMANCE_SCHEMA tables. PERFORMANCE_SCHEMA is the correct tool because it exposes dedicated tables - specifically replication_group_member_stats - that track conflict detection metrics like COUNT_TRANSACTIONS_IN_QUEUE, COUNT_CONFLICTS_DETECTED, and COUNT_TRANSACTIONS_REMOTE_APPLIED, giving real-time…
Question
Options
- AThe PERFORMANCE_SCHEMA tables
- BThe SHOW PROCESSLIST command
- CThe INNODB Lock Monitor details
- DThe SHOW STATUS command
- EThe INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables
How the community answered
(58 responses)- A71% (41)
- B14% (8)
- C9% (5)
- D5% (3)
- E2% (1)
Explanation
PERFORMANCE_SCHEMA is the correct tool because it exposes dedicated tables - specifically replication_group_member_stats - that track conflict detection metrics like COUNT_TRANSACTIONS_IN_QUEUE, COUNT_CONFLICTS_DETECTED, and COUNT_TRANSACTIONS_REMOTE_APPLIED, giving real-time visibility into Group Replication's optimistic concurrency control process. SHOW PROCESSLIST (B) only shows active thread states, not replication-specific conflict statistics. InnoDB Lock Monitor (C) covers row-level locking within a single node, not the distributed certification-based conflict detection that Group Replication uses. SHOW STATUS (D) provides general server counters but lacks Group Replication-specific conflict metrics. INFORMATION_SCHEMA (E) holds metadata about schema objects and plugins, not runtime replication performance data.
Memory tip: Think "Performance Schema = Precise Stats" - whenever a question asks about monitoring or diagnosing replication internals in MySQL, PERFORMANCE_SCHEMA is almost always the answer because it was purpose-built for that observability layer.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.