Given: class X { private X() { } void one() { } } public class Y extends X { private Y() { } public static void main (String[] args) { new Y().one(); } } Which change will make this code compile?

Adding the `public` modifier to the declaration of class `X` would not resolve the issue of `X`'s private constructor being inaccessible to its subclass `Y`.

Removing the `private` modifier from the `X()` constructor makes it accessible (default/package-private), allowing the `Y()` constructor to implicitly call `super()` and properly initialize its superclass `X`, thereby resolving the compilation error related to inheritance.

Adding the `protected` modifier to the declaration of the `one()` method would change its access level but does not address the fundamental problem of `Y` being unable to call an accessible constructor in its superclass `X`.

Removing the `Y()` constructor would result in a default public no-argument constructor being generated for `Y`, which would still implicitly attempt to call the inaccessible private `X()` constructor, leading to the same compilation error.

Removing the `private` modifier from `Y()` constructor would make it accessible from anywhere in the same package, but it does not resolve the issue of `Y`'s constructor needing to call an accessible `X()` constructor.