1Z0-060 · Question #33
You notice a high number of waits for the db file scattered read and db file sequential read events in the recent Automatic Database Diagnostic Monitor (ADDM) report. After further investigation…
The correct answer is A. Missing or stale histogram statistics C. High clustering factor for the indexes D. High value for the DB_FILE_MULTIBLOCK_READ_COUNT parameter. D:DB_FILE_MULTIBLOCK_READ_COUNT is one of the parameters you can use to minimize I/O during table scans. It specifies the maximum number of blocks read in one I/O operation during a sequential scan. The total number of I/Os needed to perform a full table scan depends on such…
Question
You notice a high number of waits for the db file scattered read and db file sequential read events in the recent Automatic Database Diagnostic Monitor (ADDM) report. After further investigation, you find that queries are performing too many full table scans and indexes are not being used even though the filter columns are indexed. Identify three possible reasons for this.
Options
- AMissing or stale histogram statistics
- BUndersized shared pool
- CHigh clustering factor for the indexes
- DHigh value for the DB_FILE_MULTIBLOCK_READ_COUNT parameter
- EOversized buffer cache
How the community answered
(64 responses)- A55% (35)
- B14% (9)
- E31% (20)
Explanation
D:DB_FILE_MULTIBLOCK_READ_COUNT is one of the parameters you can use to minimize I/O during table scans. It specifies the maximum number of blocks read in one I/O operation during a sequential scan. The total number of I/Os needed to perform a full table scan depends on such factors as the size of the table, the multiblock read count, and whether parallel execution is being utilized for the operation.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.