What are three considerations for using thin clones with Machine Creation Services? (Choose three.)

The correct answer is B. Relatively difficult to backup or restore compared to full clones D. Slower performance than full clones E. High storage impact during a boot storm. Explanation/Reference: https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX224040 The delta structure was first chosen for a number of reasons, however the main reasons were Small storage footprint Fast VM create and reset times as the delta disks takes very little time to create. This is…

Design a Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops Solution

Question

Exhibit

Options

AHigher storage space requirements than full clones
BRelatively difficult to backup or restore compared to full clones
CSlower provisioning speed compared to full clones
DSlower performance than full clones
EHigh storage impact during a boot storm

How the community answered

(52 responses)

A
6% (3)
B
83% (43)
C
12% (6)

Explanation

Explanation/Reference: https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX224040 The delta structure was first chosen for a number of reasons, however the main reasons were Small storage footprint Fast VM create and reset times as the delta disks takes very little time to create. This is because of the use of delta disks do come with a downside Some backup solutions don't backup VMs that contain a delta structure. Storage migration while not impossible is more complicated VM migration does not work on all hypervisors Block alignment issues on some hypervisors when using delta disks. As the storage is unaware of the VM structure, it is unable to apply any optimisations to the way that it stores the data. As the deltas grow over time, this can lead to disk fragmentation on the storage, leading to increased load

Topics

#thin clones#Machine Creation Services#boot storm#storage performance

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 1Y0-403 Practice