1Y0-401 · Question #78
Scenario: A Citrix Architect is designing a multi-server Provisioning Services solution for CGE. The solution must be highly available and minimize the risk of vDisk inconsistency. How should the…
The correct answer is D. By implementing RAID 10. For local vDisk storage that requires both fault tolerance and high performance, the architect should implement RAID 10.
Question
Options
- ABy implementing RAID 0
- BBy implementing RAID 1
- CBy implementing high-speed local storage with deduplication
- DBy implementing RAID 10
How the community answered
(30 responses)- A3% (1)
- B10% (3)
- C3% (1)
- D83% (25)
Why each option
For local vDisk storage that requires both fault tolerance and high performance, the architect should implement RAID 10.
RAID 0 (Striping) offers excellent performance but provides no fault tolerance, meaning a single disk failure results in complete data loss, which is unacceptable for critical vDisk storage.
RAID 1 (Mirroring) provides fault tolerance by duplicating data, but its write performance is limited and read performance is typically not as high as RAID 10, making it less optimal for high-performance vDisk demands.
Implementing high-speed local storage with deduplication focuses on space efficiency and potentially read caching, but deduplication itself does not inherently provide fault tolerance or directly enhance raw I/O performance in the same way as RAID levels like RAID 10.
RAID 10 (Striping with Mirroring) combines the performance benefits of RAID 0 (striping) with the fault tolerance of RAID 1 (mirroring), making it an ideal choice for high-I/O applications like Provisioning Services vDisk storage that require both speed and data redundancy.
Concept tested: RAID levels for PVS local vDisk storage performance and fault tolerance
Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/whats-new-in-storage
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.