1Y0-401 · Question #389
Scenario: The company is designing a cost-efficient environment for the call center workers. The IT department is replacing the existing thin clients with newer models.
The correct answer is A. Hosted shared. This question asks for the most cost-efficient environment type for call center workers, who often benefit from a hosted shared desktop model.
Question
Options
- AHosted shared
- BHosted VDI
- CStreamed VHD
- DLocal VM
How the community answered
(22 responses)- A73% (16)
- B5% (1)
- C18% (4)
- D5% (1)
Why each option
This question asks for the most cost-efficient environment type for call center workers, who often benefit from a hosted shared desktop model.
A hosted shared desktop environment (often implemented using technologies like Citrix XenApp or Microsoft RDS) is highly cost-efficient for call center workers because multiple users share a single server's resources. This reduces the number of underlying VMs and OS licenses needed, making it ideal for task-oriented users who primarily run a limited set of applications.
Hosted VDI (Virtual Desktop Infrastructure) provides dedicated virtual machines to each user, which is less cost-efficient than a shared desktop model due to higher resource requirements (storage, CPU, memory) per user.
Streamed VHD (Virtual Hard Disk) typically refers to application or OS streaming solutions, which might be part of an environment but don't define the entire desktop delivery model as cost-efficiently as a shared session host for call centers.
A local VM implies running a virtual machine directly on the end-user device or a powerful local workstation, which contradicts the use of thin clients and the goal of a centralized, cost-efficient environment.
Concept tested: VDI vs. Hosted Shared Desktop for Call Centers
Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/remote/remote-desktop-services/rds-consider-options
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.