1Y0-231 · Question #89
Scenario: A Citrix Administrator is concerned about the number of health checks the Citrix ADC is sending to backend resources. The administrator wants to find a way to remove health checks from…
The correct answer is D. Use the no-monitor option. Using the no-monitor option when binding a service to a virtual server instructs the Citrix ADC to skip health checks for that specific service, giving administrators granular control without altering the monitor itself. Option A (reverse-condition monitoring) inverts a…
Question
Scenario: A Citrix Administrator is concerned about the number of health checks the Citrix ADC is sending to backend resources. The administrator wants to find a way to remove health checks from specific bound services. How can the administrator accomplish this?
Options
- AUse reverse-condition monitoring.
- BUnbind the current monitor.
- CUse service groups to minimize health checks.
- DUse the no-monitor option.
How the community answered
(55 responses)- A7% (4)
- B11% (6)
- C4% (2)
- D78% (43)
Explanation
Using the no-monitor option when binding a service to a virtual server instructs the Citrix ADC to skip health checks for that specific service, giving administrators granular control without altering the monitor itself. Option A (reverse-condition monitoring) inverts a monitor's success/failure logic - it doesn't remove health checks, it just flips what counts as "up." Option B (unbinding the monitor) would leave the service with no monitor at all, which typically causes ADC to fall back to a default monitor rather than suppressing checks entirely, and it's a blunt action affecting all bindings. Option C (service groups) consolidates monitoring across grouped services but doesn't eliminate checks - it actually applies one monitor to many members efficiently. A helpful memory tip: think of no-monitor = "don't check this one" - it's a targeted suppress flag at bind time, not a change to the monitor object itself, so it leaves everything else untouched.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.