Refer to the exhibit. A company requires all lOS devices' operating system versions to be greater than 13.0.0 and has created a compliance policy for enforcement. One of the devices* OS versions Is…

Question

Exhibit

Options

• AAfter 1 day, the user will receive a push notification.
• BAfter 2 days, boxer app will be removed from the concerned device.
• CImmediately, the concerned device will be marked as "Not Compliant".
• DAfter 1 day, admin will receive an email for the Non-compliant device.
• EImmediately, the concerned device will be enterprise wiped.

• A
  8% (2)
• B
  84% (21)
• C
  4% (1)
• E
  4% (1)

Explanation

Options B and D are correct because the compliance policy exhibit defines a two-stage escalation: after 1 day of non-compliance, an email alert is sent to the admin (D), and after 2 days, the Boxer email app is automatically removed from the device as an enforcement action (B). These timed, graduated responses are the exact actions configured in the UEM compliance policy shown.

Why the distractors are wrong:

• A is incorrect because the push notification in the policy is directed toward the admin or is configured at a different interval - not a user push notification at the 1-day mark.
• C is incorrect because the exhibit shows a grace period is configured before the device is officially flagged as "Not Compliant" - detection alone does not trigger an immediate status change in this policy.
• E is incorrect because enterprise wipe is a drastic action that is not defined in the policy's escalation steps and would not trigger immediately upon detection.

Memory tip: Think of UEM compliance as a "warn before punish" escalation ladder - Day 1 = notify the admin (email), Day 2 = punish the device (remove app). The system detects first, warns second, and enforces last - never wipes immediately on first detection.

No community discussion yet for this question.