Suandi is documenting the technology choices of his Web development team. In the document, he explains his reasons for using JavaScript as a development language on the client side because:

Question

Options

• Ait is best suited for open-source browsers.
• Bit is compatible with the widest variety of Web browsers.
• Cit is the scripting version of the popular Java programming language.
• Dit was specifically developed for use with the Internet Explorer Web browser.

• B
  88% (21)
• C
  8% (2)
• D
  4% (1)

Explanation

JavaScript is correct as B because it is a web standard supported natively by virtually all modern browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, etc.) - making cross-browser compatibility its defining practical advantage for client-side development.

Why the distractors are wrong:

• A is wrong because JavaScript compatibility is not tied to open-source browsers specifically - it works equally in proprietary browsers like older IE or Safari.
• C is wrong because JavaScript is not a scripting version of Java - they share a superficially similar name for marketing reasons (Java was popular when JavaScript launched in 1995), but they are completely different languages with different syntax, runtime, and purpose.
• D is wrong because JavaScript was created by Netscape, not Microsoft, and was never exclusive to Internet Explorer - IE actually had its own rival scripting language called VBScript.

Memory tip: Think "JavaScript = Universal Browser Language." The key word in the question is client side - the whole point of running JS in the browser is that users don't need to install anything extra, which only works if all browsers already support it.

No community discussion yet for this question.