1D0-61B · Question #5
User feedback can be evaluated in many ways. Which of the following methods is more quantitative than direct user feedback, and will provide indirect feedback from the majority of users who do not…
The correct answer is B. Site server logs. Site server logs (B) are correct because they automatically capture quantitative data - page views, click paths, session durations, error rates - for every visitor, including the silent majority who never fill out surveys or respond to emails. This makes them both more…
Question
User feedback can be evaluated in many ways. Which of the following methods is more quantitative than direct user feedback, and will provide indirect feedback from the majority of users who do not respond?
Options
- AUser surveys
- BSite server logs
- COnline e-mail links
- DOpt-in bulk mail services
How the community answered
(36 responses)- A6% (2)
- B81% (29)
- C11% (4)
- D3% (1)
Explanation
Site server logs (B) are correct because they automatically capture quantitative data - page views, click paths, session durations, error rates - for every visitor, including the silent majority who never fill out surveys or respond to emails. This makes them both more quantitative (numerical, measurable) and more representative than any opt-in feedback method.
User surveys (A) are wrong because they rely on voluntary participation, meaning only a small, self-selected subset of users respond - skewing results and missing most of your audience. Online email links (C) suffer the same bias: only motivated users click and respond. Opt-in bulk mail services (D) are wrong for the same reason - "opt-in" means users choose to receive them, which excludes the passive majority entirely.
Memory tip: Think of server logs as a silent observer - they watch everyone automatically, while surveys, email links, and bulk mail only hear from people who chose to speak up.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.